First, I would like to say that I had a little difficult
time reading “Barn Burning” and still follow the plot fully. I feel as though Faulkner’s syntax is (hmmm .
. . . .how do I say this?) cluttered? Or at least it feels cluttered. And there is something about his diction that
makes it hard for me to focus and keep the plot in mind at the same time.
Maybe it is the way he uses pronouns?
I think this could have been intentional. Faulkner is writing with the perspective of a
ten year old in mind. There are points
when then text is obviously fragmented to only show the reader what the boy
sees.
An example of this is when the young boy is chopping wood-
the reader sees several brief scenes and then the boy chops more wood.
Solution
I read “Barn Burning” twice, wrote on the side of the book (I
always do though) and focused on specific elements of the story.
Point of View
One of the elements I focused on was point of view. Faulkner writes this short story from the limited
omniscience perspective. But he adds
inner monologues that offer hints into the father and events that that happed
before the story starts. He also gives
the perspective of the boy’s future self which allows him to explore/ explain
the father character better.
What’s with the “groves”?
In “Barn Burning” the scenes are frequently set using “groves”
of two types of trees. I thought at
first that they might show a shift in the story or have some sort of other
purpose. But I have had a hard time proving
anything yet with the text.
I definitely feel
like Faulkner uses nature in an interesting way. It is almost like he interrupts his own style
with these images of birds and trees. It
fits with the story still but it feels like it is so obviously deliberate that
it must serve a certain purpose.
_(photo_by_Carl_van_Vechten).jpg)
These are good observations, especially about Faulkner's prose style and syntactical weirdness. It's what he's known for. If you dare, pick up one of his novels -- "As I Lay Dying" has multiple narrators, who never really identify themselves, which includes a mentally handicapped boy, who, in one section, gets drunk.
ReplyDeleteIt's high modernism at its finest, putting very specific and heavy responsibilities on the reader, making you an active agent in the creation of meaning.
How do you think nature is used in the other stories? Is its depiction more similar or more different?